Question bank › GCSE › GCSE Geography › Paper 2 Section C – The challenge of resource management

Resource management (water/food/energy)

2 guides

Answer on paper first, then reveal the mark scheme one mark at a time.

6 marks · 7–8 minutes

6 marks – do large water transfer schemes bring more benefits than problems?

'Large-scale water transfer schemes bring more benefits than problems.'

Using an example, to what extent do you agree with this statement? [6 marks]

What is being assessed
  • AO1: show knowledge of a named scheme and its features
  • AO2: show understanding of how and why the scheme causes benefits and problems
  • AO3: weigh benefits against problems and reach a supported judgement
What examiners reward
  • A named large-scale scheme with specific features (dams, tunnels, rivers, places served)
  • Benefits and problems explained for both the donor and the receiving areas
  • Social, economic and environmental impacts
  • A judgement that considers who gains, who loses, and sustainability
LevelMarksWhat it looks like
Level 3 (Detailed)5–6Detailed, accurate knowledge of a named scheme. Benefits and problems are explained in developed chains of reasoning and weighed against each other to reach a clear, justified judgement on 'to what extent'.
Level 2 (Clear)3–4Clear knowledge of a scheme with some specific detail. Benefits and problems are explained, but one side may be thin and the judgement only partly supported.
Level 1 (Basic)1–2Basic or generic knowledge, possibly without a named scheme. Benefits or problems are listed rather than explained, with little or no judgement.
How to plan it
  1. Lesotho Highlands Water Project: Lesotho (surplus) → Gauteng, South Africa (deficit); treaty 1986
  2. Benefits: reliable water for Gauteng; royalties and HEP for Lesotho
  3. Problems: displacement and lost farmland; reduced river flows; corruption
  4. Judgement: largely agree – but gains go mainly to the receiving area
Show the top-band model answer

The Lesotho Highlands Water Project, agreed in a treaty between Lesotho and South Africa in 19862, transfers water from the mountains of Lesotho, which have a water surplus1, through dams such as Katse and Mohale and tunnels into the Vaal river system, to supply Gauteng, the area around Johannesburg and Pretoria, which has a large water deficit.

The scheme has brought major benefits. Gauteng, South Africa's economic heartland, now has a more reliable water supply for homes, factories and mines, which supports jobs and economic growth3. Lesotho, one of the poorest countries in Africa, receives royalty payments4 for the water, which form an important part of government income, and the 'Muela hydroelectric power station reduces its need to import electricity.

However, there have been serious problems. Thousands of people lost homes or farmland when valleys were flooded, and many said their compensation was inadequate. Reduced river flows below the dams have harmed river ecosystems5 and the people who rely on them, and the project's chief executive was convicted of taking bribes from construction companies.

Overall, I agree to a large extent, because the scheme supplies water to millions of people and gives Lesotho much-needed income. However, the problems fell mainly on rural communities in Lesotho6, while the main gains went to South African cities, so the benefits only outweigh the problems if those who lose out are properly compensated.

1. Uses the key idea of surplus and deficit areas to explain why transfer is needed.
2. Accurate, specific case-study detail (AO1).
3. Benefit explained, not just stated (AO2).
4. Considers benefits to the donor area as well as the receiving area – shows range.
5. Environmental impact gives the answer a full range of problems.
6. Weighs who gains and who loses – this is what lifts the judgement into Level 3 (AO3).
Where marks are usually lost
  • Describing the scheme without discussing impacts
  • Only covering the receiving area
  • Confusing large-scale transfer schemes with small-scale sustainable schemes
  • Writing a 9-mark essay – in this 6-mark question, two or three developed points each way plus a judgement is enough
  • Concluding without weighing benefits against problems
6 marks · 7–8 minutes

6 marks – explain how the UK's energy mix has changed

Explain how the UK's energy mix has changed in recent decades. [6 marks]

What is being assessed
  • AO1: show knowledge of places, environments and processes
  • AO2: show understanding by explaining how and why, in developed chains of reasoning
What examiners reward
  • Accurate description of the changes (coal decline, gas, growth of renewables, nuclear)
  • Explaining WHY each change happened (climate targets, falling domestic supply, cost, technology)
  • Specific evidence and examples
  • Developed reasoning rather than a list of energy sources
LevelMarksWhat it looks like
Level 3 (Detailed)5–6Accurate, specific knowledge (named place or example where asked) is used to give a developed explanation, with clear links between cause and effect and the question set.
Level 2 (Clear)3–4Relevant knowledge and some explanation, but links are partial or one-sided, or place detail is limited.
Level 1 (Basic)1–2Basic, generic or isolated points with little explanation or place detail.
How to plan it
  1. Coal: from the main source of electricity to zero in 2024 – why
  2. North Sea oil and gas: production peaked around 2000 → more imports
  3. Renewables: wind growth – why (targets, falling costs, offshore conditions)
  4. Nuclear: ageing plants, Hinkley Point C
Show the top-band model answer

The UK's energy mix has shifted away from fossil fuels, especially coal, towards renewable energy. In the 1990s coal was still a major source of electricity, but its use fell steadily, and the UK's last coal-fired power station, Ratcliffe-on-Soar, closed in 20241. This happened because burning coal releases large amounts of carbon dioxide, and the UK has legal targets to cut emissions under the Climate Change Act 2008, so coal power was taxed and phased out2.

Natural gas replaced much of the coal because it releases less carbon dioxide per unit of energy. However, North Sea oil and gas production peaked around 2000 and has since declined, so the UK now imports much of its gas, which reduces its energy security3.

Renewable energy has grown rapidly and in 2024 produced just over half of the UK's electricity for the first time. Wind power has expanded most, especially offshore, because the UK has strong, reliable winds and shallow seas4, and the cost of turbines has fallen. Nuclear power has declined as old power stations close, but a new plant, Hinkley Point C in Somerset, is being built to provide a low-carbon, reliable supply when wind and solar output is low5.

1. Precise, up-to-date evidence of the change.
2. Explains the reason for the change – what moves this into Level 2.
3. Links a change in supply to a consequence.
4. Explains why wind specifically has grown.
5. Shows understanding of why a mix is needed.
Where marks are usually lost
  • Listing energy sources without saying how their share has changed
  • Describing changes without explaining why
  • Out-of-date claims (e.g. that coal still provides a large share of UK electricity)
  • Writing about energy in LICs instead of the UK

Stuck on this topic?

Book a free 30-minute session on WhatsApp and we'll find exactly which step is costing you the marks. Or build a timed paper on it.

Free 30-minute session