9 marks – has economic development improved quality of life in an NEE?
Using an example of an LIC or NEE, to what extent has rapid economic development improved the quality of life of its people? [9 marks]
- AO1: show knowledge of named places, environments and processes
- AO2: show understanding of how and why things happen, and how factors interact
- AO3: apply that knowledge to analyse, evaluate and reach a supported judgement
- A named LIC/NEE with specific evidence of economic development (e.g. growth in oil, manufacturing, services, TNC investment)
- Explaining how development improves quality of life (jobs, incomes, services, infrastructure)
- Evidence that benefits are uneven (regional, social, environmental)
- Using development indicators carefully as evidence
- A clear judgement on 'to what extent'
| Level | Marks | What it looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Level 3 (Detailed) | 7–9 | Accurate, detailed knowledge of named places and processes is used purposefully. Explanation is thorough and linked back to the question. Evaluation weighs both sides and reaches a clear, justified conclusion about 'how far'. |
| Level 2 (Clear) | 4–6 | Relevant knowledge with some specific place detail. Explanation is clear but may be uneven. Some evaluation, but the conclusion may be asserted rather than fully supported. |
| Level 1 (Basic) | 1–3 | Generic or partly accurate knowledge with little place detail. Points are mostly descriptive, with little or no evaluation or judgement. |
- Nigeria: NEE, rebased GDP 2014 → Africa's largest economy at that time
- Benefits: oil revenue, TNCs (e.g. Shell, Unilever), Nollywood and services – jobs and incomes, especially in Lagos
- Limits: oil dependence, Niger Delta pollution, inequality, low life expectancy
- Judgement: some improvement, but limited and unevenly shared
Show the top-band model answer
Nigeria is a newly emerging economy in West Africa. In 2014, when its GDP was recalculated1 to include fast-growing industries such as telecommunications and the film industry, it became Africa's largest economy at that time.
Economic development has improved quality of life for some people. Oil, mostly from the Niger Delta, earns the large majority of Nigeria's export income, and this money has paid for roads, schools and power stations. TNCs such as Shell and Unilever provide jobs and training, and their workers have regular incomes that allow them to afford better housing, healthcare and education2 for their children. Growth in services such as banking, mobile phones and Nollywood, one of the world's largest film industries, has created a growing middle class, especially in Lagos. Mobile phone access has also allowed people in rural areas3 to use mobile banking and receive market information.
However, the benefits have been limited and uneven. Because the economy depends so heavily on oil, falls in the oil price cut government income and jobs. In the Niger Delta, where much of the wealth is produced, many local people have suffered from oil spills that polluted farmland and fishing grounds; in 2015 Shell agreed to pay £55 million in compensation to the Bodo community4 for spills in 2008. Wealth is concentrated in the south and in cities5, while the north has lower incomes, poorer access to education and has been affected by conflict, including attacks by Boko Haram. Corruption has also meant that oil money has not always reached ordinary people. Development indicators show this: life expectancy is still only in the low-to-mid 50s6, among the lowest in the world, and around 40% of Nigerians lived below the national poverty line in 2019.
Overall, rapid economic development has improved quality of life only to a limited extent7. A wealthier urban minority and those with jobs in TNCs and services have clearly benefited, but because growth has relied on oil and its rewards have been unequally shared, many Nigerians, especially in the north and the Niger Delta, have seen little improvement.
- Describing Nigeria's location and economy without linking to quality of life
- Treating GDP growth as proof that everyone is better off
- Out-of-date or invented statistics – round figures and say when they are from
- Discussing only TNCs, so the answer lacks range
- No final judgement