Question bank › GCSE › GCSE Geography › Paper 1 Section B – The living world

Living world (ecosystems, rainforests, hot deserts/cold environments)

2 guides

Answer on paper first, then reveal the mark scheme one mark at a time.

9 marks · 11–12 minutes

9 marks – do the economic benefits of deforestation outweigh the costs?

'The economic benefits of deforestation are greater than the environmental costs.'

Using a case study of a tropical rainforest, to what extent do you agree with this statement? [9 marks]

What is being assessed
  • AO1: show knowledge of named places, environments and processes
  • AO2: show understanding of how and why things happen, and how factors interact
  • AO3: apply that knowledge to analyse, evaluate and reach a supported judgement
What examiners reward
  • A named rainforest case study with specific causes of deforestation (e.g. cattle ranching, soya, mining, roads, hydroelectric power)
  • Economic benefits explained, including who gains
  • Environmental costs explained at local and global scale (biodiversity, soil, water cycle, climate)
  • Weighing short-term against long-term and local against global
  • A clear judgement on 'greater than'
LevelMarksWhat it looks like
Level 3 (Detailed)7–9Accurate, detailed knowledge of named places and processes is used purposefully. Explanation is thorough and linked back to the question. Evaluation weighs both sides and reaches a clear, justified conclusion about 'how far'.
Level 2 (Clear)4–6Relevant knowledge with some specific place detail. Explanation is clear but may be uneven. Some evaluation, but the conclusion may be asserted rather than fully supported.
Level 1 (Basic)1–3Generic or partly accurate knowledge with little place detail. Points are mostly descriptive, with little or no evaluation or judgement.
How to plan it
  1. Economic benefits in the Amazon: cattle, soya, mining, HEP, roads – explain who gains
  2. Environmental costs: biodiversity, soil erosion, water cycle, carbon
  3. Weigh: who benefits vs who pays; short vs long term; rates rose and fell
  4. Judgement: disagree overall – benefits are real but short-term and unevenly shared
Show the top-band model answer

In the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, deforestation has brought clear economic benefits. Cattle ranching is the biggest cause of clearance1, and Brazil has become one of the world's largest beef exporters, earning export income and providing jobs on ranches and in meat-processing plants. Large areas have also been cleared for soya, which is exported as animal feed. Mining, such as the huge Carajás iron ore mine, and hydroelectric dams such as Belo Monte on the Xingu River provide raw materials and electricity for Brazil's growing industries and cities. Roads like the Trans-Amazonian Highway, begun in the 1970s, opened up the region for settlers. For an NEE, these activities help pay off debt and raise national income2.

However, the environmental costs are severe. The rainforest is the most biodiverse ecosystem on Earth, so clearing it destroys habitats and threatens species with extinction before some have even been studied. Once the trees are removed, there is no canopy to intercept heavy rainfall and no roots to hold the soil, so the thin, nutrient-poor soil is quickly eroded3 and washed into rivers. Because so much rainfall in the Amazon is recycled through transpiration4, removing trees makes the local climate drier, which increases the risk of drought and forest fires. Globally, burning and clearing forest releases stored carbon as carbon dioxide, adding to climate change, and some studies now suggest parts of the south-eastern Amazon release more carbon than they absorb.

Weighing these up, the benefits are real but they are short-term and unevenly shared5. Much of the profit goes to large landowners and companies, while indigenous communities lose land and resources and some were displaced by Belo Monte. Cattle pasture on eroded soil becomes unproductive within a few years, so the economic gain itself does not last, whereas the loss of biodiversity is permanent. The costs are also felt by the whole world through climate change. On the other hand, Brazil showed that it can reduce clearance while its economy grows: annual deforestation fell from about 27,800 km² in 2004 to about 4,600 km² in 20126 through stronger enforcement and protected areas, suggesting the benefits do not require such large losses.

Overall, I disagree with the statement7. Deforestation brings important income to Brazil, but the environmental costs are long-lasting, global and often irreversible, while the benefits are temporary and go to a minority. A more sustainable approach, using selective logging, ecotourism and enforced protection, could keep much of the economic value without the environmental damage.

1. Accurately identifies the main driver in the named case study – specific AO1.
2. Takes the 'benefits' side seriously, which is needed for a balanced evaluation.
3. Links deforestation to a process, using knowledge of rainforest nutrient cycling (AO2).
4. Shows understanding of interdependence in the ecosystem.
5. Evaluative criteria – time scale and who gains – lift this into Level 3.
6. Evidence used to make an argument, not just quoted.
7. Clear judgement that follows from the weighing above.
Where marks are usually lost
  • Writing generic 'trees are cut down' points with no named rainforest or specific causes
  • Listing environmental impacts without explaining the process (e.g. why soil erodes after clearance)
  • One-sided answers that only discuss costs, so there is nothing to weigh
  • Ending with 'it depends' without saying on what, or giving no conclusion
  • Spending time on management strategies that the question did not ask about, without linking them to the judgement
6 marks · 7–8 minutes

6 marks – explain how plants and animals adapt to hot desert conditions

Explain how plants and animals have adapted to the physical conditions of hot deserts. [6 marks]

What is being assessed
  • AO1: show knowledge of places, environments and processes
  • AO2: show understanding by explaining how and why, in developed chains of reasoning
What examiners reward
  • Linking each adaptation to a specific physical condition (low/unreliable rainfall, extreme daytime heat, cold nights, poor soils)
  • Covering both plants and animals
  • Named examples (e.g. cactus, camel, fennec fox)
  • Explaining HOW the feature helps survival, not just naming it
LevelMarksWhat it looks like
Level 3 (Detailed)5–6Accurate, specific knowledge (named place or example where asked) is used to give a developed explanation, with clear links between cause and effect and the question set.
Level 2 (Clear)3–4Relevant knowledge and some explanation, but links are partial or one-sided, or place detail is limited.
Level 1 (Basic)1–2Basic, generic or isolated points with little explanation or place detail.
How to plan it
  1. Open with the conditions: less than 250 mm rain a year, very hot days, cold nights, sandy infertile soil
  2. Plants: water storage, spines/waxy surfaces, root systems, ephemerals
  3. Animals: camel, fennec fox, nocturnal behaviour
  4. Every point: feature → how it works → which condition it overcomes
Show the top-band model answer

Hot deserts receive less than 250 mm of rain a year1, daytime temperatures can exceed 40°C and nights can be cold, so living things must save water and cope with heat.

Cacti such as the saguaro have thick, fleshy stems that swell to store water after rain, so the plant can survive long dry periods. Their leaves have been reduced to spines, which lowers the surface area for transpiration and so reduces water loss2, while also stopping animals eating the plant for its moisture. A waxy coating on the stem further reduces evaporation. Many cacti have shallow but very widespread roots that quickly absorb rain before it evaporates, whereas plants such as the mesquite tree have very long tap roots that reach groundwater3 deep below the surface. Ephemeral plants survive as seeds for long periods, then germinate, flower and set seed within a few weeks after rain, so they avoid the driest conditions completely4.

Camels store fat in their humps5, which can be broken down for energy when food is scarce, and they can tolerate losing a large proportion of their body water, so they can travel long distances without drinking. Long eyelashes and nostrils that can close protect them during sandstorms. The fennec fox has very large ears that radiate heat away from its body, helping it stay cool, and it is nocturnal, hunting in the cooler night and sheltering in burrows during the heat of the day, which reduces water loss through sweating and panting6.

1. Sets out the physical conditions with accurate figures, so every adaptation can be linked to one.
2. Explains the mechanism – this is what separates Level 2 from listing.
3. Second, contrasting root strategy shows depth of knowledge.
4. Ephemerals explained as a timing strategy – a precise, well-developed point.
5. Accurate – avoids the common misconception that humps store water.
6. Behavioural adaptation linked back to the water-loss problem.
Where marks are usually lost
  • Saying camels store water in their humps (they store fat)
  • Listing features ('spines, roots, big ears') without explaining how they help
  • Writing about cold environments or rainforests by mistake
  • Only covering plants or only animals when the question asks for both

Stuck on this topic?

Book a free 30-minute session on WhatsApp and we'll find exactly which step is costing you the marks. Or build a timed paper on it.

Free 30-minute session